ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the sociodemographic and psychological factors influencing the continuity of treatment of patients with chronic kidney disease under the regular epidemic prevention and control of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Methods A total of 277 patients with chronic kidney disease who were admitted to Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University) from Apr. 2020 to Mar. 2021 were enrolled and divided into 3 groups: non-dialysis group (n=102), hemodialysis (HD) group (n=108), and peritoneal dialysis (PD) group (n=67). All patients were investigated by online and offline questionnaires, including self-designed basic situation questionnaire, self-rating anxiety scale (SAS), and self-rating depression scale (SDS). The general sociodemographic data, anxiety and depression of the 3 groups were compared, and the influence of sociodemographic and psychological factors on the interruption or delay of treatment was analyzed by binary logistic regression model. Results There were significant differences in age distribution, marital status, occupation, medical insurance type, caregiver type, whether there was an urgent need for hospitalization and whether treatment was delayed or interrupted among the 3 groups (all P0.05). The average SAS score of 65 PD patients was 38.15+/-15.83, including 53 (81.5%) patients without anxiety, 7 (10.8%) patients with mild anxiety, and 5 (7.7%) patients with moderate to severe anxiety. The average SAS score of 104 patients in the HD group was 36.86+/-14.03, including 81 (77.9%) patients without anxiety, 18 (17.3%) patients with mild anxiety, and 5 (4.8%) patients with moderate to severe anxiety. There were no significant differences in the mean score of SAS or anxiety severity grading between the 2 groups (both P0.05). The mean SDS scores of 65 PD patients were 53.42+/-13.30, including 22 (33.8%) patients without depression, 21 (32.3%) patients with mild depression, and 22 (33.8%) patients with moderate to severe depression. The mean SDS scores of 104 patients in the HD group were 50.79+/-10.76, including 36 (34.6%) patients without depression, 56 (53.8%) patients with mild depression, and 12 (11.6%) patients with moderate to severe depression. There were no significant differences in mean SDS scores or depression severity grading between the 2 groups (both P0.05). The results of intra-group comparison showed that the incidence and severity of depression were higher than those of anxiety in both groups. Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis showed that high school education level (odds ratio OR=5.618, 95% confidence interval CI) 2.136-14.776, P0.01), and unmarried (OR=6.916, 95% CI 1.441-33.185, P=0.016), divorced (OR= 5.588, 95% CI 1.442-21.664, P=0.013), urgent need for hospitalization (OR=8.655, 95% CI 3.847-19.476, P0.01) could positively promote the continuity of treatment in maintenance dialysis patients under the regular epidemic prevention and control of COVID-19. In the non-dialysis group, no sociodemographic and psychological factors were found to be associated with the interruption or delay of treatment (P0.05). Conclusion Education, marital status, and urgent need for hospitalization are correlated with the continuity of treatment in patients with chronic kidney disease on maintenance dialysis.Copyright © 2022, Second Military Medical University Press. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: COVID 19 and increasing unmet needs of health technology had accelerated an adoption of digital health globally and the major categories are mobile-health, health information technology, telemedicine. Digital health interventions have various benefit on clinical efficacy, quality of care and reducing healthcare costs. The objective of the study is to identify new reimbursement policy trend of digital health medical devices in South Korea. Method(s): Official announcements published in national bodies and supplementary secondary research were used to capture policies, frameworks and currently approved products since 2019. Result(s): With policy development, several digital health devices and AI software have been introduced as non-reimbursement by utilizing new Health Technology Assessment (nHTA) pathway including grace period of nHTA and innovative medical devices integrated assessment pathway. AI based cardiac arrest risk management software (DeepCARS) and electroceutical device for major depressive disorders (MINDD STIM) have been approved as non-reimbursement use for about 3 years. Two digital therapeutics for insomnia and AI software for diagnosis of cerebral infarction were approved as the first innovative medical devices under new integrated assessment system, and they could be treated in the market. In addition, there is remote patient monitoring (RPM) reimbursement service fee. Continuous glucose monitoring devices have been reimbursed for type 1 diabetes patients by the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) since January 2019. Homecare RPM service for peritoneal dialysis patients with cloud platform (Sharesource) has been reimbursed since December 2019, and long-term continuous ECG monitoring service fee for wearable ECG monitoring devices (ATpatch, MEMO) became reimbursement since January 2022. Conclusion(s): Although Korean government has been developed guidelines for digital health actively, only few products had been reimbursed. To introduce new technologies for improved patient centric treatment, novel value-based assessment and new pricing guideline of digital health medical devices are quite required.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
The aim of this work was to perform a comparative analysis of the prevalence and clinical and laboratory features of the course of COVID-19 infection in patients with end-stage chronic kidney disease receiving kidney replacement therapy (KRT). Methods. A retrospective analysis of 73 medical records of patients undergoing KRT and infected COVID-19 between January 1, 2021 and December 31, 2021. The patients were divided into two groups. The first group consisted of 54 hemodialysis (HD) patients, and the second group included 19 peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Routine clinical and laboratory characteristics, morbidity, and mortality of COVID-19 depending on KRT modality were analysed. Results. The overall prevalence of COVID-19 was 37.63%. Mortality in this cohort of patients was 19.07%, and mortality associated with COVID-19 was 6.19%. Despite the predominance of COVID-19-associated morbidity in HD patients (46.55% vs. 24.36%, p = 0.05), mortality was not statistically significantly different between the studied groups (26.32% in PD patients vs. 12.96% in HD patients, p = 0.17). HD patients had more severe lung injury as measured by SpO2 (p=0.18) and CT (p=0.003), while PD patients had lower hemoglobin (p=0.001), platelet (p=0.001), total protein (p<0.001), and albumin (p<0.001) levels. A direct correlation was found between the percentage of lung injury according to the CT data and the leukocyte count in both the HD (r = 0.24) and PD (r = 0.56) groups. In addition, an inverse correlation between leukocyte and SpO2 values and between the percentage of lung injury according to the CT data and SpO2 indicators was found in the HD (r = -0.51 and r = -0.66) and PD (r = -0.47 and r = -0.63) groups, respectively. Conclusions. The results of our study are in complete agreement with published data and show the same COVID-19-associated mortality in HD and PD patients, with a statistically significantly higher prevalence of COVID-19 in HD patients. The course of COVID-19 in HD patients is characterized by more severe lung injury compared to PD patients, while PD patients had more pronounced anemia and significantly lower platelet, total protein, and blood albumin concentrations. © T. Yarmola, L. Tkachenko, H. Pustovoyt, S. Rustamian, V. Talash, Iu. Kostrikova, L. Miakinkova, O. Gutsalenko, 2023. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic is a real challenge to our communities worldwide, exerting a high socioeconomic impact. The disease is associated with a great deal of co-agulation cascade disorder, with a considerable increase in D-dimer concentration in blood. Objec-tives: To assess the impact of dialysis session frequency on blood levels of D-dimer among CKD patients infected with COVID-19. Patients and Methods: The study included 40 CKD patients (22 males and 18 females) infected with COVID-19, who attended the Artificial Kidney Unit at Al Hussein Teaching Hospital, Thi-Qar, Iraq for regular dialysis. They were divided into two groups;Group I: 20 CKD patients who had COVID-19. They underwent one hemodialysis session per week. The second group, which included 20 CKD patients infected with COVID-19 underwent three dialysis sessions per week. Plasma levels of D-dimer were measured one day before the start of the study and one day after three weeks in both groups. Result(s): The results of the present study re-vealed that CKD patients infected with COVID-19 who underwent three dialysis session per week (Group II) had a significant drop in blood D-dimer level at the end of three weeks in comparison to the initial values. Furthermore, the decrease in blood D-dimer level was significantly higher among CKD patients with COVID-19 who underwent three dialysis sessions per week (Group II) in comparison to COVID-19 infected CKD patients who underwent single dialysis sessions per week (Group I). Conclusion(s): CKD patients with COVID-19 have an elevated blood level of D-dimer. Increasing the frequency of hemodialysis plays an essential role in lowering the serum D-dimer level among these patients.Copyright © 2023, Colegio de Farmaceuticos de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Renal patients are particularly vulnerable to infection in part because they are relatively, or significantly, immunocompromised, undergo numerous invasive procedures and typically have frequent contact with healthcare institutions putting them at much higher risk of nosocomial infections. In addition, they are typically exposed to multiple antibiotics, which may select out resistant organisms or damage protective microbiomes. The Covid-19 pandemic has brought the life and death importance of infection control to every renal unit and forced a, perhaps overdue, appreciation of the issues and responsibilities associated with nosocomial infections. In addition, our patients are disproportionately impacted by the growing emergence of antimicrobial resistance. This chapter reviews the key aspects of nosocomial infections in renal patients and the important elements of infection control and antibiotic stewardship that can protect our patients. © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2014, 2022.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Glycogen Storage Disease Type Ia (GSDIa) is a rare inherited disorder resulting in acute hypoglycemia due to impaired release of glucose from glycogen. Despite dietary management practices to prevent hypoglycemia in patients with GSDIa, complications still occur in children and throughout adulthood. This retrospective cohort study compared the prevalence of complications in adults and children with GSDIa. Method(s): Using ICD-10 diagnosis codes, the IQVIA Pharmetrics Plus database was searched for patients with >=2 GSDI claims (E74.01) from January 2016 through February 2020, with >=12 months continuous enrollment beginning prior to March 2019 (for one year of follow-up before COVID-19), and no inflammatory bowel disease diagnoses (indicative of GSDIb). Complication prevalence in adults and children with GSDIa was summarized descriptively. Result(s): In total, 557 patients with GSDIa were identified (adults, 67%;male, 63%), including 372 adults (median age, 41 years) and 185 children (median age, 7 years). Complications occurring only in adults were atherosclerotic heart disease (8.6%), pulmonary hypertension (3.0%), primary liver cancer (1.9%), dialysis (0.8%), and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (0.3%). Other complications with the greatest prevalence in adults/children included gout (11.8%/0.5%), insomnia (10.0%/1.1%), osteoarthritis (22.0%/2.7%), severe chronic kidney disease (4.3%/0.5%), malignant neoplasm (10.8%/1.6%), hypertension (49.7%/8.7%), acute kidney failure (15.3%/2.7%), pancreatitis (3.0%/0.5%), gallstones (7.8%/1.6%), benign neoplasm (37.4%/8.1%), hepatocellular adenoma (7.0%/1.6%), neoplasm (41.1%/9.7%), and hyperlipidemia (45.2%/10.8%). Complications with the greatest prevalence in children/adults included poor growth (22.2%/1.9%), gastrostomy (29.7%/3.2%), kidney hypertrophy (2.7%/0.8%), seizure (1.6%/0.5%), hypoglycemia (27.0%/11.3%), hepatomegaly (28.7%/15.9%), kidney transplant (1.6%/1.1%), diarrhea (26.5%/18.6%), nausea and/or vomiting (43.8%/35.8%), acidosis (20.0%/17.2%), and anemia due to enzyme disorders (43.8%/40.6%). Conclusion(s): GSDIa is associated with numerous, potentially serious complications. Compared with children, adults with GSDIa had a greater prevalence of chronic complications, potentially indicating the progressive nature of disease. Children with GSDIa had more acute complications related to suboptimal metabolic control.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Besides in-centre ECMO care, the certificated ECMO centre of the University Hospital Regensburg (UKR) offers out-of-centre ECMO initiation with mobile equipment. During the pandemic situation, this treatment was especially meant for patients with critical cardiopulmonary failure in remote hospitals who present themselves as too unstable for interhospital transfer. We evaluated if treatment with outof-centre ECMO initiation could benefit patients;outcome, by comparing this group with a group of COVID-19 patients who received ECMO therapy at the UKR by in-hospital initiation. Method(s): Retrospective single-centre study including 169 patients who received ECMO due to COVID-19- induced cardiopulmonary failure between March 2020 till March 2022. Patients;population was separated into two groups according to the location of ECMO initiation, out-of-centre or in-centre, and into two subgroups by the used ECMO mode, venovenous (VV) or venoarterial (VA). We compared demographics, treatment duration, adverse events and patient;s outcome. The primary endpoint of the investigation was patients;survival to hospital discharge rate or death on ECMO or after ECMO explant. Result(s): Regarding the total study population, 98 (58.0%) of the 169 patients could be discharged from the UKR. Before initiation of ECMO therapy and with regard to complications during the course of intensive care, such as renal failure requiring dialysis or bleeding, there were no relevant differences between the two groups and subgroups. The out-of-centre group showed a significantly higher survival rate with 70 (63.6%) survivors out of 110 externally cannulated patients. Conclusion(s): In the study population, external ECMO cannulation was beneficial in terms of survival, although the reasons did not show significant differences between the groups. A possible approach for the good overall survival of the study groups in international comparison could be the existing centre expertise. (Figure Presented).
ABSTRACT
BackgroundDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, asynchronous consultations were introduced for patients with vasculitis. To assess disease activity without of face-to-face clinical reviews and blood testing, patients submitted patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) via electronic survey forms, which were subsequently triaged by clinicians.Objectives1. To investigate how patients' vasculitis disease activity was affected by the COVID-19 pandemic through retrospective comparison of clinician-assessed scores recorded pre-pandemic with intra-pandemic self-reported patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and disease scores submitted by patients remotely.2. To assess patients' clinical outcomes, including allocation of follow-up and further management/treatment escalation during this period.3. To validate self-reported BVAS scores against an existing PROM.MethodsThis is a retrospectively study of patients with a known diagnosis of vasculitis under the care of the Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford. For the purposes of this study, we included patients with all vasculitis diagnoses.Clinician-reported scores (Bristol Vasculitis Activity score v.3, BVAS) were recorded during in-person clinics pre-pandemic (defined as 01/01/2019-31/12/2019) [1].Patients' self-reported BVAS (SR-BVAS) and AAV-PRO (ANCA-associated vasculitis patient-reported outcomes) scores were submitted by patients via electronic forms containing the requisite questionnaires sent out during-pandemic (defined as 01/12/2020-31/03/22) [2].SR-BVAS has not been validated but was collected to allow clinical comparison to disease activity scores completed by clinicians. Response were stored and analysed in a secure database. Score comparison was performed using Wilcoxon Sign Rank testing. Clinical outcome data was collected from the local Electronic Patient Record. Data analysis was performed in Microsoft Excel and R (version 4.2.1).ResultsWe noted a significantly higher overall level of patient-reported disease activity during the pandemic than was recorded in clinics prior. In the total cohort of all vasculitis patients for whom we had data, the median BVAS increased from 2 pre-pandemic (N = 335, range 0-21) to 6 intra-pandemic (N = 143, range 0-42) (p <0.001). The overall proportion of patients with severe/active disease (defined as BVAS ≥4) increased from 27% to 36% during the pandemic period.In a smaller cohort of 64 patients for whom we had paired pre- and during-pandemic scores, increased disease activity was reported (p<0.01). Notably, the number with a BVAS consistent with severe disease increased from 7 (11%) to 19 (30%).There was a significant positive correlation between SR-BVAS and AAV-PRO (r=0.61, p< 0.001) submitted by patients during-pandemic;however, at low BVAS (≤3), the AAV-PRO ranged widely (28-87)Follow-up data was available for all 64 patients in this cohort: 8/19 (42%) with a during-pandemic SR-BVAS ≥4 were seen in clinic within 3 months (telemedicine or face-to-face).ConclusionPatients reported worsening of vasculitis disease activity during the COVID-19 pandemic. This may be attributable to impacts on well-being or access to healthcare services. We note that disease activity scores in vasculitis may be limited in their ability to capture the whole picture disease activity in the absence of clinical assessment [3]. 42% of patients with self-reported high disease activity were seen within 3 months. There was a significant positive correlation between AAV-PRO and SR-BVAS, suggesting it has some use as a PROM.References[1]Mukhtyar C, Lee R, Brown D, Carruthers D, Dasgupta B, Dubey S, et al.. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Dec;68(12):1827–32.[2]Malley T, Jackman J, Manderson S, Saldana Pena L, Evans E, Barrett J, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 Jun 1;80(Suppl 1):289.[3]Luqmani RA. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation. 2015 Apr 1;30(suppl_1):i76–82.Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsNone Declared.
ABSTRACT
As the rate of natural disasters and other devastating events caused by human activities increases, the burden on the health and well-being of those affected by kidney disease has been immeasurable. Health system preparedness, which involves creating a resilient system that is able to deal with the health needs of the entire community during times of unexpected disruptions to usual care, has become globally important. In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, there is a heightened awareness of the amplification of negative effects on the renal community. Paradoxically, the complex medical needs of those who have kidney diseases are not met by systems handling crises, often compounded by an acute increase in burden via new patients as a result of the crisis itself. Disruptions in kidney care as a result of unexpected events are becoming more prevalent and likely to increase in the years to come. It is therefore only appropriate that the theme for this year's World Kidney Day will focus on Kidney Health for All: preparedness for the unexpected in supporting the vulnerable. © 2023 JSC Vidal Rus. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
BackgroundApproximately 700 dialysis patients are seen at our hospital. Among them are patients with HCC that develop viral hepatitis. Advances in ultrasound systems have improved the accuracy of HCC treatment and diagnosis. This time, we had the opportunity to use microwaves for dialysis patients using Smart Fusion and needle navigation installed in APLIOi800 so that we will report it.MethodsTen dialysis patients were treated from January 2018 to February 2023. An Emprint (Covidien, USA) antenna was used for treatment. Canon APLIOi800(Canon, Tochigi, Japan) was used. The built-in function is Smart Fusion. This method can display ultrasound imaging and volume data from other modalities, such as CT and MRI, in association with positional information using a magnetic sensor. Needle navigation has a function that can confirm the position of the needle. It is possible to treat even when the tumor is overprinted and the visualization is poor due to bubbles. Informed consent was obtained from all patients and the treatment was performed.ResultsIt was possible to visualize all tumors. In this study, CT images were used in 0 cases, and MRI was used in 1 Case. No serious side effects occurred after treatment.ConclusionsUsing this method, it was thought that dialysis patients could be safely and accurately treated.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: More than 200 patients have benefited from lung transplantation who failed to recover from COVID-19-induced acute respiratory distress (ARDS) with conventional ventilatory support and/ or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support (ECMO) in USA. We aim to share our experience and lessons learned at our institute through this case series. Method(s): After IRB approval, we performed a retrospective chart review and identified 37 patients who received ECMO for COVID-19 induced ARDS between May 2020 through January 2022. Out of these, 12 received a formal consultation from the transplant team. We studied patient characteristics, interventions during ECMO support, and evaluation outcomes. Result(s): Most of our patients had single organ failure i.e., lung, except for two who required dialysis after ECMO initiation. Six out of the 12 patients received bilateral lung transplant. One patient received the transplant before ECMO initiation. However, the patient required two runs of ECMO after the transplant due to postop complications from suspected COVID19 reinfection and deceased on postoperative day 101. All the patients after transplant had an expedited recovery except one who required prolonged hospitalization before starting physical therapy. The median length of hospital stay for the transplant group was 148 (89- 194) days and for the non-transplant group was 114 (58-178) days. The 30-day survival rate was 100% for the transplant group. At a median follow-up of 207 (0- 456) days after discharge, 5(83.3%) patients in the transplant group and 3(50%) patients in the nontransplant group were alive. In the non-transplant group, 4 patients received ECMO support for more than 75 days and at last follow-up 2 were alive and functioning well without needing new lungs. This asks for an objective prospective study to define the timeline of irreversibility of the lung injury. Conclusion(s): Lung transplantation is a viable salvage option in patients with COVI-19 induced irreversible lung injury. However, the irreversibility of the lung injury and the timing of lung transplant remains to be determined case-by-case. (Figure Presented).
ABSTRACT
Objective: To examine whether established patient-reported outcome measures are suitable for capturing the impact of ARPKD in children and their families. Method(s): We assessed 44 children with ARPKD (40 families) with respect to patients' health-related quality of life ((hr- QOL) using PedsQLTM ESRD module) and mental health (strength and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ)) as well as family and caregiver burden (Impact on family score (IFS) und Ulm inventory of parental caregiver QOL (ULQIE)) and compared them to published data and 36 healthy control children matched for age and time. Result(s): Patients were aged 9.5 +/- 5.9 years (vs. controls 8.8 +/- 5.0, p = ns) and 21 (48%) were female (vs. 19 controls (53%), p = ns). Mean eGFR was 81 ml/min*1.73m2 (range 4 - 165);7 received dialysis and 11 had functioning kidney transplants (KTX, 2 combined with liver transplants). Eight patients had developmental delay secondary to medical complications, while chronic illness was an exclusion criterion for healthy controls. 61 caregivers of affected children had same gender-distribution (61% vs. 60% mothers) and age (both 42 +/- 7 years) and number of dependent children (1.8 +/- 0.9 vs. 2.0 +/- 0.8) as 57 caregivers of healthy children. The mean proxy reported PedsQL Total score was 77.5 +/- 10.6 (range 59 - 96). It correlated significantly to eGFR (r = 0.5, p < 0.01, (also within the subpopulations pre- and post-KTX)). Parents reported greater mental health problems in affected than in control children with a higher SDQ total score mainly due to higher scores in the hyperactivity and peerinteraction subscales. ULQIE revealed that parents of affected children had significantly lower levels of physical functioning, self-fulfillment and general QOL, but despite higher emotional burden scores they indicated similar satisfaction with family life. Impact on family scores were in a similar range to those of children with moderate to severe disabilities. Conclusion(s): The good spread of PedsQLTM ESRD-scores and their correlation to renal function indicates that it captures significant aspects of ARPKD, however, it may need further adjustment to include liver complications. All four chosen instruments revealed significant impact of ARPKD on hrQOL and mental health of affected children as well as family life and parental wellbeing in comparison to healthy controls. More problems with peer-interactions may also be due to more stringent shielding of chronically ill children from social contacts during the COVID pandemic compared to healthy children.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Mucormycosis is a rare invasive fungal infection with high lethality, affecting mainly patients with hematological neoplasia, decompensated diabetes, and covid-19 infection. The aim was to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of liposomal Amphotericin B (standard treatment) versus isavuconazole for treating mucormycosis in the consolidation phase from the perspective of the Brazilian Unified Health System. Method(s): A decision tree model was built. The analysis considered the costs of the treatment over a six-month time horizon. This included hospitalization during the entire course of treatment and the expenditures related to dialysis, complication occurring in 5% (3%-6%) of cases treated with the Amphotericin B. Appointments with specialists were included in the isavuconazole arm, and amphotericin B was used if the patient failed to respond to isavuconazole. The utility of the patient with mucormycosis, cured and with renal failure was estimated. Uncertainties were assessed through probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses. Result(s): The average cost of amphotericin B and isavuconazole arm was R$1.054.874,39 and R$522.344,05, respectively. The utility was 0.479 with amphotericin B and 0.480 with isavuconazole. The ICER was R$ -684,494,237 (dominant). In deterministic sensitivity analysis, the probability of dialysis was the variable with the greatest impact. In probabilistic analysis, the ICER is distributed in the right and left lower quadrant, the acceptability curve for all the scenarios analyzed is favorable for isavuconazole. The budget impact suggests a potential savings of between R$ 350 million and R$ 415 million over five years. Conclusion(s): The treatment of mucormycosis during the consolidation phase with isavuconazole represents a lower cost, besides the convenience of oral treatment and reduced incidence of severe adverse events, with mortality similar to the Amphotericin B arm. In Brazil, the formulation of posaconazole approved is inadequate for treating mucormycosis during the consolidation phase, therefore isavuconazole is the single oral drug available.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) has been associated with an increased mortality rate among hospitalized patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, AKI among hospitalized patients with COVID-19 is not well described.Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we enrolled adult patients who were referred to Al -Hussein Teaching Hospital in Thi-Qar Governorate, Iraq, from 15 February to 15 May 2020, diagnosed with Corona Varus by Real-Time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) A test with a diagnosis of COVID.-19. AKI was determined according to the outcome criteria for creatinine determination and Introduced by the KDIGO in 2012. Patients were stratified based on recovery, dialysis, and hospital mortality. We also assessed risk indicators associated with AKI during hospitalization along with in-hospital outcomes, recovery rate, and death at the time of discharge. And after three months of going out for both sexes.Results: We evaluated 2044 patients, whose ages ranged from 18 to more than 65 years, for both males and females, and the percentage of males 54.7% and females 45.3% were admitted with a diagnosis of COVID-19. AKI occurred in 194(8.02%) patients;55(35.5%) of the patients with AKI required dialysis. It was observed that 43.1% of males recovered to 43.8% of the females who were cured inside the hospital, and there was a percentage of patients Those who needed dialysis, and there was a percentage of deaths among males and females. Patients with AKI showed a significantly higher mortality rate. The patients' condition was followed up after their discharge from the hospital, and the percentage of those who were cured and the patients who needed dialysis was determined, and the rate and mortality.conclusion: We found that male sex, patients' ages, history of chronic kidney disease, and disease severity were independent risk factors associated with AKI in COVID-19 patients. Whereas, acute renal insufficiency was associated with an increased risk of death, increased dialysis patients, and in -hospital complications. Our results indicate the need for more careful care and monitoring of AKI during hospitalization in patients with COVID-19, and non-recovery of acute renal impairment on hospital discharge is a common complication in these patients.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, some continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT) initiations were transitioned to telemedicine to improve the timeliness of initiation, and minimize COVID-19 transmission. While telemedicine would appear acceptable for many clinical settings, safety and timeliness of telemedicine CKRT initiation is undescribed. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients on CKRT from January 2021-September 2022. Information on patient characteristics and CKRT therapy was extracted from the electronic health record. Multidisciplinary team provider attitudes and perspectives were assessed using survey. RESULTS: During the study period, there were 101 CKRT circuit initiations in patients not previously receiving CKRT, with 33% (33/101) initiated by telemedicine. There were no differences in patient characteristics, including age, weight at initiation, severity of illness, nor degree of fluid overload between the in-person and telemedicine initiation cohorts. CKRT telemedicine initiations were timelier, occurring on average 3.0 h after decision to initiate therapy compared to 5.8 h for all in-person CKRT starts (p < 0.001) and 5.5 h for night and weekend in-person starts (p < 0.001). Complications did not differ between telemedicine and in-person starts (15% vs. 15%, p = 0.99) and initial circuit life was similar. There were no differences in likelihood of death or duration of CKRT therapy. Telemedicine initiations were widely acceptable to multidisciplinary providers. CONCLUSION: In appropriately selected patients, telemedicine initiation of CKRT is a timely and safe option. Further standardization of telemedicine initiation of CKRT should be considered to improve the timely delivery of CKRT and may improve nephrology workforce wellness. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: There are not enough data on the post-CO-VID-19 period for peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients affected from COVID-19. We aimed to compare the clinical and laboratory data of PD patients after COVID-19 with a control PD group. METHODS: This study, supported by the Turkish Society of Nephrology, is a national, multicenter retrospective case-control study involving adult PD patients with confirmed COVID-19, using data collected from April 21, 2021, to June 11, 2021. A control PD group was also formed from each PD unit, from patients with similar characteristics but without COVID-19. Patients in the active period of COVID-19 were not included. Data at the end of the first month and within the first 90 days, as well as other outcomes, including mortality, were investigated. RESULTS: A total of 223 patients (COVID-19 group: 113, control group: 110) from 27 centers were included. The duration of PD in both groups was similar (median [IQR]: 3.0 [1.88-6.0] years and 3.0 [2.0-5.6]), but the patient age in the COVID-19 group was lower than that in the control group (50 [IQR: 40-57] years and 56 [IQR: 46-64] years, p < 0.001). PD characteristics and baseline laboratory data were similar in both groups, except serum albumin and hemoglobin levels on day 28, which were significantly lower in the COVID-19 group. In the COVID-19 group, respiratory symptoms, rehospitalization, lower respiratory tract infection, change in PD modality, UF failure, and hypervolemia were significantly higher on the 28th day. There was no significant difference in laboratory parameters at day 90. Only 1 (0.9%) patient in the COVID-19 group died within 90 days. There was no death in the control group. Respiratory symptoms, malnutrition, and hypervolemia were significantly higher at day 90 in the COVID-19 group. CONCLUSION: Mortality in the first 90 days after COVID-19 in PD patients with COVID-19 was not different from the control PD group. However, some patients continued to experience significant problems, especially respiratory system symptoms, malnutrition, and hypervolemia.
ABSTRACT
Background: End-stage renal disease is the last stage of chronic kidney disease and can affect the quality of life (QOL) of dialysis patients. The aim of this study was to assess the quality of life and examine its determinants. Methods: A cross-sectional survey involving patients on dialysis in a tertiary hospital was conducted from July 2020 to September 2020. Demographic data were collected using a predesigned questionnaire. QOL was measured using the 36-item KDQOL questionnaire, and statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS version 25. Results: Of the 108 patients, 59 were men and 49 were women, and the mean age was 48.15 ± 15.4 years. The results showed that there was no significant difference in the mean score of all components of health-related quality of life in different types of dialysis. The demographic data, which included age, gender, ethnicity, marital status, education level, occupation, and monthly income, did not significantly affect the QOL of dialysis patients. Patients with a dialysis duration of more than 5 years had a better QOL compared to other groups. Laboratory parameters such as low albumin and low hemoglobin showed a significant correlation with the health-related quality of life of dialysis patients. Conclusion: The quality of life among patients on dialysis was impaired, especially in terms of burden of the kidney disease. Hypoalbuminemia and anemia were the two factors that influenced QOL.
ABSTRACT
Rationale & Objective: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic imposed several changes in the care of patients with kidney failure receiving dialysis. We explored patient care experiences during the pandemic. Study Design: The study team verbally administered surveys including Likert scale multiple-choice questions and open-ended questions and recorded responses. Setting & Participants: Surveys were administered to adults receiving dialysis through an academic nephrology practice after the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Exposure: Outpatient dialysis treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic. Outcomes: Perceptions of care and changes in health. Analytical Approach: Multiple-choice responses were quantified using descriptive statistics. Thematic analysis was used to code open-ended responses and derive themes surrounding patient experiences. Results: A total of 172 patients receiving dialysis were surveyed. Most patients reported feeling "very connected" to the care teams. Seventeen percent of participants reported transportation issues, 6% reported difficulty obtaining medications, and 9% reported difficulty getting groceries. Four themes emerged as influencing patient experiences during the pandemic: 1) the COVID-19 pandemic did not significantly affect participants' experience of dialysis care; 2) the COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted other aspects of participants' lives, which in turn were felt to affect mental and physical health; 3) regarding dialysis care experience more generally, participants valued consistency, dependability, and personal connection to staff; and 4) the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the importance of external social support. Limitations: Surveys were administered early in the COVID-19 pandemic, and patient perspectives have not been reassessed. Further qualitative analysis using semi-structured interviews was not performed. Survey distribution in additional practice settings, using validated questionnaires, would increase generalizability of the study. The study was not powered for statistical analysis. Conclusions: Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, perceptions of dialysis care were unchanged for most patients. Other aspects of participants' lives were impacted, which affected their health. Subpopulations of patients receiving dialysis may be more vulnerable during the pandemic: those with histories of mental health conditions, non-White patients, and patients treated by in-center hemodialysis. Plain-language summary: Patients with kidney failure continue to receive life-sustaining dialysis treatments during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. We sought to understand perceived changes in care and mental health during this challenging time. We administered surveys to patients receiving dialysis after the initial wave of COVID-19, asking questions on topics including access to care, ability to reach care teams, and depression. Most participants did not feel that their dialysis care experiences had changed, but some reported difficulties in other aspects of living such as nutrition and social interactions. Participants highlighted the importance of consistent dialysis care teams and the availability of external support. We found that patients who are treated with in-center hemodialysis, are non-White, or have mental health conditions may have been more vulnerable during the pandemic.